The following was written by Tamanna A., the special girl in my life; it’s her view on the current situation of Iraq. It’s well written and well organized. Please comment after you finish reading it; she’ll appreciate it.
With the Iraqi nation deteriorating each day and descending into civil war it is very important for the American troops to withdraw. Bush failed to prove that there were any weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; however, he was able to capture Saddam Hussein. And as far as decreasing terrorism in Iraq, it seems that the attacks have been increasing. The rising death among U.S. troops and Iraqis is narrowing down Bush’s options. The idea that U.S. can prevent Iraq from going into civil war or even establish a stable democracy has been long lost so, why are our troops still there? What is Bush trying to prove?
Bush should really think about more effective plans with the little time he has left in office to gain back the publics support. Bush had tried to convince the public that he had a perfect plan before the November elections, but with the victory of Democrats, it clearly shows that not many people believe in him anymore. Billions of dollars have been wasted and many lives have been taken so that Bush can prove that he was right. He refused and still refuses to accept the fact that his plan failed.
![]() |
Al- Sadr is also another big issue. Sadr seems to be the single most powerful political leader in Iraq. Without him removed Iraq will soon go into civil war. The country has already divided into three groups; Kurds, Sunni and Shiite. We need to find someone who is strong enough to hold together the three groups that have now formed in Iraq. Is Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki right for the job? According to Washington Post, during the conference with the Prime Minister, Bush honored him as “the right guy for Iraq.”. Well, only time will tell.
The only way to make the Iraqi government do anything for themselves would be to reorganize our troops to the borders of Iraq and let the Iraqis deal with their own problems. Let the Iraqis have their civil war if that’s the only way the country’s problems will be solved. This will reduce the need for American troops in Iraq and give the Iraqi people what they want, control of what happens in their own country without interferences from outsiders. The government and the Iraqi army can only take control of its own country is when the U.S lets them. How long can we baby sit? Sooner or later the Iraqi government has to take control and they will decide what is best for their country. Who are we to always interfere with other affairs of other countries?
Bush’s dream for a unified Iraq has been shattered long ago and the country has been dividing day by day. The best option right now is for a partition and it seems that the country has already been headed toward that direction with the new constitution. According to Time magazine, 80 % of Iraqi voters approved the new constitution. This constitution will allow three powerful groups their own government, control over oil resources in their own territory, and allow them to have their own regional army.
After meeting President Bush in Jordan, Mr. Maliki told ABC News, “I can say that Iraqi forces will be ready, fully ready to receive this command and to command its own forces, and I can tell you that by next June our forces will be ready,”. Well, after watching ABC news, our troops are training the Iraqi military and Bush won’t withdraw our troops until the country is ready to support itself or until the government doesn’t ask them to leave. It seems as if the country is already very much dependent on the US. There is very little doubt that Mr. Maliki will be ready by next June. I guess we have no choice but to wait and see.
We can keep sending troops in so they can be killed or we can bring them home. Bush needs to admit he was wrong and ask other countries for help. Sometimes even the most powerful country needs help from others. If he is afraid that by pulling back, Iraq will be more destabilized then he needs to come up with better plans, because until we let Mr. Maliki run his own country and give him his responsibilities, we will never know whether he can do the job or not. We can’t keep sending more troops; this isn’t our fight any more. We did what we could and now it is out of our control.
This war in Iraq has become a chaos and our troops haven’t made any improvements, but it seems that matters have gone worse. It doesn’t seem like a civil war but more of a religious war between Sunnis and Shiites. What more can we do by staying there but letting our troops die in a war that we have already lost a long time ago. I believe that now is the time we give all the responsibilities over to Mr. Maliki and withdraw our troops. America needs to wake up and stop letting our troops die for the mistake that one man had made. Bush is being arrogant, but we can not be, because the lives of our troops are at stake.
|
2 Responses
MODERN b0i
December 4th, 2006 at 2:21 am
Paragraph two reads:
“Bush should really think about more effective plans with the little time he has left in office to gain back the publics support.”
Bush has no need to “gain back public support,” he is not concerned with re-election.
The democrats got elected touting an Iraqi exit plan they know they can’t follow through with as it would leave a power vacuum that might be filled with an anti-American dictator.
This piece is weak when arguing about the civil war.
It states that the U.S. cannot prevent a civil war in Iraq, then it states that without Al-Sadr removed civil war cannot be avoided–this somewhat implies that REMOVING Al-Sadr would PREVENT civil war–this causes confusion and needs clarification.
The last paragraph reads:
“It doesn’t seem like a civil war but more of a religious war between Sunnis and Shiites.”
This implies that Iraq IS ALREADY IN CIVIL WAR when previous paragraphs stated Iraq is heading into civil war, this creates confusion.
“We can keep sending troops in so they can be killed or we can bring them home.”
Forcing the reader to choose strictly from two choices is faulty reasoning and only undermines the argument. Nobody in the U.S. is sending troops to Iraq SPECIFICALLY “so they can be killed.”
“Bush needs to admit he was wrong and ask other countries for help.”
The U.S. is not the only supplier of troops in Iraq, so the type of help Bush needs to ask for also needs clarification.
Also, this piece attacks President Bush’s persona every time it says he needs to admit he’s wrong–this again only serves to undermine the credibility of the author and the argument. The purpose of this explanation needs to be clarified, especially when President Bush has clearly admitted to being mislead about Weapons of Mass Destruction and he’s stated clearly he believes his plan is working.
Many believe what is going on in Iraq is past the “civil war” status. It is much worse and it is not a civil war is as civil war is highly organized and typically fought between two distinct sides, the internal conflict in Iraq is highly fragmented and often fought by mercenaries and people from outside Iraq.
Lastly, the title “We want our troops back, but when?” goes directly against the argument of the piece. The piece is arguing FOR an immediate withdraw but the title implies a lack of urgency with the “bug when?”
I hope this feedback helps this “special girl in your life.”
Sunny
December 9th, 2006 at 2:37 pm
She’s a smart girl and this is her opinion about the war. I don’t know why she hasn’t responded to your comment yet.
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
Great Links
Categories
Archives
Top Commentators
name (3)best jackblack betting te... (1)
TotKigflift (1)
Jennie Marks (1)
Marina Raymond (1)
england big bluff poker club (1)
anime manga porn for free (1)
NocaIntenna (1)
(1)
(1)
About Me
Subscribe
Calendar
Recent Readers
Great Posts
How to Make Money with Low Blog Traffic, No BSHow to Make Money from YouTube
Indian Guy Gets Caught Cheating on His Wife on the Radio
2x, 3x, or Even 4x your AdSense Earnings, Guaranteed!
Start Getting LinkBacks Effectively, No BS